CRITICAL STUDIES - amateur vs professionalism
Defining what makes an artwork professional over amateur is a difficult question because it is not necessarily made to fulfil a set of customer expectations like a commercial product or service is. I think a good way to start identifying an amateurish piece is by looking at the artists intentions - did they want the piece to look this way as a creative choice or is it down to lack of skill? The first artist I want to look at is Daniel Johnston who's work is considered to be somewhere between outsider and pop. Walk in the Truth, Daniel Johnston I like this drawing because it feels very honest, like a visualisation of Johnston's thoughts with imaginary characters that those voices are assigned to. The suicidal implications of the words are reduced to something insignificant by the silliness of the cartoon creatures and I think it's a jarring contrast of ideas. The slightly humanoid cartoon animals allude to psychedelia which was a popular theme in music during his youth, and...